One thing myself and many others have noticed about the religious right’s arguments against same-sex marriage is that they’re the same arguments proponents of interracial marriage used 50-60 years ago.
Don’t believe me? Take a look at this (warning pdf).
http://www.equalitygiving.org/files/Marriage-Equality-Same-Sex-Lesbian-Gay-Marriage/Arguments_Against_Interracial_Marriage_and_Equal_Marriage.pdf
Here’s a few of the most damning quotes:
Same-sex relationships are “unnatural” and “unhealthy.”
(Source: Vermont House and Senate Judiciary Committee Public Hearings, 1/25/00, 2/1/00)
vs
“The amalgamation of the races is not only unnatural, but is always productive of deplorable results. The purity of the public morals, the moral and physical development of both races, and the highest advancement of civilization … all require that [the races] should be kept distinctly separate, and that connections and alliances so unnatural should be prohibited by positive law and subject to no evasion.”
(Source: Dissenting California Supreme Court Justice objecting to that Court’s decision striking down a state law ban on interracial marriage in Perez_v. Lippold, 198 P.2d 17, 41 (1948), (Shenk, J. dissenting)
Same-sex couples cannot biologically conceive children together, and therefore can’t satisfy the goals of marriage.
(Source: Vermont House and Senate Judiciary Committee Public Hearings, 1/25/00, 2/1/00)
vs
“When people of the same race marry, they cannot possibly have any progeny, … and such a fact sufficiently justifies those laws which forbid their marriages.”
(Source: A judge in a Missouri case, quoted in Eric Zorn, Chicago Tribune, May 19,1996)
So next time a friend or family member asks what the big deal is after listening to someone vomit hate, tell them to replace same-sex with interracial and they’ll get it. Hell why stop there, next time someone defends saying “that’s so gay” tell them to replace gay with black and end two fountains of hate with one move.